News

LABOUR CLOSE CHILDREN’S PLAYGROUND FOR EASTER

 
Conservatives in Woolwich are questioning Greenwich Council’s decision to close a popular children’s adventure playground for Easter.
 
The Plumstead Adventure Centre has a sign on the gate which says it is only open between 11.30am and 7pm when a member of staff is present. As Easter approaches, the time when many young people will want to use this facility, the Council have decided to close it completely from Friday 10th to Tuesday 14th April (inclusive)
 
On top of this, the Greenwich Council website, claims the playground, on Plumstead Common, should be open from 10am to 5pm during the school holidays.
 
Leader of Greenwich Conservatives, Cllr Spencer Drury, who took his daughter to the playground at 10.10am and found it was closed, said “I think it is quite ridiculous that the playground is closed during the school holidays. It would also be nice if Labour could talk to the people who staff the playground so at least they are advertising the right times. It is typical of this Council that they pick one of the busiest times of the year to close this facility and stop children from having a safe environment to enjoy their holidays.”
 
Local resident John Nichols, 19, who lives in Woolwich and played at the centre as a child, said “I used to enjoy playing here as a boy. I think to deprive kids in this area of the ability to use it over the bank holiday weekend is daft. I also think the fact that even when a member of staff is there, it still doesn’t open till 11.30am, reflects the lack of effort being made by the council for the youngsters in this area.”
 
UPDATE:  (9th April 4.30pm) - I have just been informed by a journalist that the Council has changed the opening times to allow the Adventure Centre to open on Saturday and Tuesday this weekend.  A (small) victory for comon sense I think, although obviously the opening hours should be longer and it should be open the rest of the time too, but this is an improvement.   

Conservatives write to residents about roadworks on A2

 
While out canvassing in Greenwich West, Peninsula and Blackheath Westcombe wards, it became clear that many residents were finding it difficult to cope with the disruption caused by the roadworks on the A2, but had little idea why these works existed.  As a result, this Saturday Conservatives from across Greenwich delivered or gave a letter to residents from Parliamentary Spokesman Cllr Spencer Drury.  The letter was very well received and Greenwich Conservatives are pleased that they could be of help to residents.  The letter reads:-
 
"Dear Resident,
 
 
 

RE:      Roadworks on the A2

 
Over recent weeks local Conservatives and I have been canvassing across the Greenwich area and it has become clear that residents have not been fully informed of the reason for the roadworks on Blackheath Hill and Shooters Hill which are causing such congestion and delay across the area. As a result I thought it might be useful to write to update you on the current situation.
 
As I am sure you are aware, the roadworks were started on 15th February and are scheduled to last for approximately eight weeks. I understand that the main purpose of the roadworks is:-
v      Full reconstruction of the carriageway
v      An improved drainage system
v      Installation of new street lighting
v      Improved facilities for pedestrians and cyclists
Local Conservatives have contacted Transport for London (TfL) to express concern that the work seems only to be happening at limited times and maybe it could be completed more quickly. In response, we have received reassurances that although TfL did consider working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, it was felt this would cause undue disturbance to residents who live near to the works. As a result, the work should be completed daily from 6am to 10pm, unless problems (like working around a gas main) stop work early as they did on 26th February. However, having monitored the work, we remain concerned that the times we have been given do not reflect the time work is being finished and would be grateful if resdients could let our local activists know if they feel the works are not continuing until 10pm. The contact name depends on the ward concerned and are laid out below:-
v      Greenwich West Ward:                Simon Gallie (Simon.Gallie@eu.nabgroup.com),                                                      or Ryan Acty (Ryan@entechts.co.uk). 
v      Blackheath Westcombe Ward:      Cllr Geoffery Brighty & Cllr Alex Wilson (details                                                       overleaf) or Elizabeth Drury.
v      Peninsula Ward:                           Charles Easton, Malcolm Reid                                                (mreid@rasini.com) or Toks Bailey                                                        (baileyfamjor@aol.com).
Greenwich Conservatives have also asked that TfL regard eight weeks as a deadline rather than an approximate estimate of when the works should finish. 
If you would like more details on the roadworks, TfL issued a press release which can be found at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/11120.aspx

. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Gareth Bacon (our Conservative GLA Assembly member) if you have any further questions.

 

Yours faithfully,


Cllr Spencer Drury

Leader of Greenwich Conservatives
Parliamentary Spokesman for Greenwich and Woolwich"
 

More help needed for Greenwich and Woolwich’s small firms during the recession

Call to make business rate relief automatic for small firms
 
Cllr Spencer Drury, Parliamentary Spokesman for Greenwich and Woolwich, this week welcomed Conservative plans to cut taxes and paperwork for small shops and small firms. In a new initiative, small business rate relief would be given automatically to firms across England, rather than businesses having to claim it and complete time-consuming forms. This comes as Parliament discusses a Conservative Private Members’ Bill to change the law in this way.
 
Small business rate relief was introduced in 2005, allowing small firms to claim up to 50 per cent off their business rate bills. However, firms have to fill out paperwork to claim the rate relief, despite the fact that Whitehall’s tax inspectors know precisely which firms are eligible for it.
 
·          According to the most recent figures, 1,051 firms claimed small business rate relief in Greenwich.
·          The Local Government Association has estimated that some 870,000 firms are eligible for the rebate but less than half have claimed. The take-up rate is estimated to be 34% in London.
·          By contrast, in Wales, small business rate relief has been automatic since 2007.
 
After rent and staff, business rates are typically the next biggest cost to local firms. Business experts have warned that 32,300 businesses will fail in 2009. Firms face a hammering this April from the Government thanks to soaring business rates:
·          Business rates are to rise by 5.0 per cent in April 2009, despite RPI inflation forecast to be negative this year, due to a statistical quirk in the way business rate rises are calculated.
·          Transitional relief from the 2005 business rates revaluation has expired, pushing up bills further for many firms in April 2009.
·          The Government has slashed rate relief on empty properties. As the recession bites, firms are unable to rent out vacant property, and have to pay rates in full without any income from rent.
 
Spencer said:
“Small shops and businesses across Greenwich and Woolwich are facing tough times in Labour’s recession. These firms, from our corner shops to local pubs, are the lifeblood of our local community. A responsible government would do more to help them.
 
“Yet Gordon Brown is making it as difficult for small firms to claim the tax relief to which they are entitled. He is compounding their misery by finding new ways to drive up business rates by stealth.
 
“Conservatives would ensure that small firms automatically receive rate relief, cutting their paperwork and tax bills and giving many of them a fighting chance to stay afloat.”
 

Labour reject Conservative proposals for increased police numbers and reduced council tax

At Wednesday's Budget meeting Labour and Liberal Democrat members voted against Conservative proposals to create a ‘Town Centre Police Team’ in the borough and to reduce Council Tax.  
 
The proposal to create a ‘Town Centre Police Team’ based in Eltham for this financial year, to be followed by another in Greenwich in 2010 was made by Conservative Leader Cllr Spencer Drury.  The purpose of the teams, each of which would be composed of one sergeant, two PCs and three PCSOs, would focus on dealing with the specific problems confronting the High Street and Greenwich Town Centre.  
 
Cllr Drury said ”Currently the Safer Neighbourhood Teams for Eltham North and Greenwich West find themselves focused on dealing with Eltham High Street and Greenwich Town Centre rather than the problems of residents in and around their wards, which means residents get a lower level of coverage than elsewhere.  This proposal would have helped reduce crime and improve the number of patrols in town centres and in Eltham North & Greenwich West.  We felt that funds could be found for the police team in Eltham immediately and would aim to reduce the publicity budget to provide extra police in Greenwich West as soon as possible.”
 
The proposal to decrease Council Tax by 0.5% was made by Conservative Finance Spokesman Cllr Andy Jennings who said “Whilst we welcome the fact that no Council Tax increase was proposed, we feel that there is scope to begin reducing the burden of taxation on local people.  The Council has shown over the last year that in difficult economic times it is prepared to spend thousands of pounds of residents’ money on business class trips to China, on doubling the frequency of its propaganda newspaper and on pointless attempts to upstage the Mayor of London at the opening of Woolwich Arsenal DLR station.  A reduction in tax would be an acknowledgement to local people that we are serious about starting to cut out some of this unnecessary spending at a time when they are trying to make their own household budgets balance.”
 
Cllr Drury said “Both of these proposals could be financed with affecting any frontline services.  Labour did not accept that more police were their responsibility although they provided them in Woolwich and on the Ferrier Estate.  I think their priorities are wrong and the fact they admit we need more police, but will not fund them reflects the muddled thinking of this Council.”

School closure is short-term panicked decision

Conservative Leader questions Labour decision to close Charlotte Turner School
 
CONSERVATIVES have questioned a decision by Greenwich council to close Charlotte Turner Primary School in Deptford.
 
The school which had just been declared inadequate and in need of special measures by OFSTED, has 238 pupils who will  now have to be placed in other schools around Greenwich and Lewisham.
 
Leader of the Conservative Group and Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Greenwich and Woolwich Cllr Spencer Drury said “I am concerned at what appears to be a panicked, short-term decision by the council.
 
"Charlotte Turner school has struggled with numbers for some time. This means some years have two forms, while others have one form and some have one and a half. This has made it hard for the school to plan ahead.
 
"In addition, the council admits it will need a school on the site in a few years time because of increase in population and so closure seems an expensive option which avoids rather than solves both  the short and long-term problems.
 
"Moreover, its rate of improvement is faster than the borough's average at KS2, and according to the latest league tables (see notes to editors) there are three schools in the Borough that are rated worse than it. Does this mean Labour is going to close them as well?
 
Finally, and most importantly, this decision should be in the best interests of the pupils at Charlotte Turner and I am concerned that the plan is to shift many of them to another school – Morden Mount - which has been named by OFSTED as needing to improve. Jamming pupils from one failing school into another one which is struggling, sounds like a recipe for disaster.
 
"Conservatives would try to stabilise the school with one form entry and copy other successful schools in the area (based in Lewisham). This would be the cost effective, and responsible decision which would bring long term benefits to the area and help existing students to improve."

Tagged in:
Syndicate content